The campaign asks the question. This answers it for your job specifically. Your occupation is scored task by task against published research on what current systems can already do, then adjusted for the things that genuinely protect work: physical presence, institutional friction, geography, and how quickly you adapt.
Five questions. Your occupation is mapped against published estimates of automation exposure, then adjusted for the friction that actually protects work: physical presence, institutional inertia, geography, and your own rate of adaptation.
Filter by sector
Moravec's paradox holds: what is hard for people is often easy for machines, and what is effortless for people is often extremely hard for machines. Hands, sites and rooms are a real shield.
Work that can be done from a keyboard anywhere competes with people anywhere.
Directional rather than prescriptive. These describe where effort tends to pay off as routine work becomes cheaper, and are meant to be adapted to your own circumstances and pace.
Everything above came out of four minutes and twenty-nine occupations. The argument underneath it, why cognitive work is becoming abundant and what stays scarce when it does, is the subject of the book.
Like to know more? Get your copy of Intelligence Capitalism today.
Get the book